Trash Talk vs. Reality

Spreading FUD (fear, uncertainty and doubt) is one of the most common sales tactics used against a competitor. I’m never surprised to hear some FUD being thrown around at a major trade show like HIMSS, but this year it seemed to be particularly virulent among the many vendors I spoke to, which did surprise me. In a market that seemingly has nearly unprecedented money flowing into it, why all the trash talk? The only rational I can come up with is that all that money flowing into healthcare IT is also attracting far more competition from ever bigger players with greater resources.

For example, a little over a year ago the HIE market was comprised of very small vendors, the majority with sales in the $15-25M range. Today we have IBM, who acquired Initiate, Ingenix, who acquired Axolotl, Aetna who acquired Medicity, GE who is partnered with ICW, Surescripts, who partnered with Kryptiq, Thomson Reuters who is partnered with Care Evolution, Microsoft with their Amalga platform, Emdeon, who rolled out their HIE solution at HIMSS’11, and Harris Corp. who announced they will acquire Carefx. This is clearly a white hot market and one that will only see more consolidation in the coming year.

Getting back to the point of this post…

One rumor I heard over and over again was that Medicity was seeing a major push-back by clients and prospects as a result of their acquisition by Aetna. Several vendors told me that the Pennsylvania HIE contract (PHIX) that was going to Medicity had been torn up due to Medicity’s new ownership structure. I was also told that several other Medicity contracts were also in jeopardy. (Note: heard nearly an equal amount of similar rumors for Axolotl, who’s parent is United Health Group.) Now this may all have some truth to it, but it is important that anyone listening to these rumors must consider the source and do their own background check.

It appears that Vermont has done just that for today they awarded the State HIE contract to Medicity. Vermont Information Technology Leaders Inc., (VITL) has been operating a pilot HIE in the State for nearly five years, using technology from GE Healthcare (it was a relatively simple document management solution) so it is with some surprise that the¬†incumbent, GE, who has been investing heavily in updating their HIE solution suite did not get the win. ¬†Another company that was likely bidding for this contract is Covisint, who recently won the contract for Vermont’s Blueprint for Health. Since there will be a direct link between VITL and Blueprint, again a bit of surprise that Covisint did not win this contract either.

So what does this tell us?

1) Despite all the rumors and trash talk not everyone is listening.

2) The fear that payer ownership of an HIE vendor will result in a sales slide for the HIE vendor may be misplaced.

3) Decent, proven technology (and likely very aggressive pricing) can overcome a lot of FUD.

Posted in Health Information Exchange Tagged with: , , ,
4 comments on “Trash Talk vs. Reality
  1. Tim Elwell says:

    Fascinating post from what is supposed to be a unbiased third party consulting organization. Somehow I think Medicity will be able to ‘weather the storm’ with or without your promotion. Perhaps we need to re-read the Chilimark HIE Report with a more jaundiced eye….

    • John says:

      Now Tim, we do try to keep an even keel here at Chilmark Research and have certainly given the folks at Medicity heartburn on more than one occasion (do a search on “where’s the beef”).

      The main point of this post is that first, there is a lot of trash talk occurring in this industry, some of it most likely unjustified and second, it is important to do your own objective research, make your own judgements based on clear analysis.

      And who knows Tim, maybe, just maybe someone looking for an HIE solution may consider even smaller vendors including one I know of that is built on an open source platform, despite the trash talk they hear from larger vendors.

  2. Tim Elwell says:

    LOL. Thanks for the plug John. Believe me when I tell you that Medicity has plenty more anti-FUD resources than MOSS does. (We don’t spend our $$ on such stuff or on lavish booths at HIMSS. It all goes into R&D.) And there has been plenty of FUD-MUD flung from the large proprietary vendors against the open source vendors — who aren’t going away. We just keep our head down and deliver and let the customers decide. And with the recent sale of Allscripts and the $1.5B return — much of it to shareholders — Misys isn’t such a ‘small vendor’. Be careful Medicity…We are nipping at your heals. (How’s that for FUD :-) )

  3. Genevieve Morris says:

    From my understanding, Pennsylvania did not cancel the Medicity contract because of the Aetna buy. Rather, the contract was awarded under the Rendell administration as a no bid contract, which upset those on the other side of the aisle. When Governor Corbett took office, one of his first tasks was cancelling the contract and having the Senate schedule hearings on HIE to determine a path forward. I think it had much more to do with the nature and expense of the contract, than with Aetna’s involvement.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Who We Are

Chilmark Research is the only industry analyst firm focusing solely on health IT. We combine proven research methodologies with intelligence and insight to provide cogent analyses of the emerging technologies that have the greatest potential to improve healthcare. We do not shy away from making tough calls, and are respected in the industry for our direct and thoughtful commentary.