Comments on: HIMSS – PHR Platforms MIA http://www.chilmarkresearch.com/2008/02/18/himss-phr-platforms-mia/ Sat, 11 May 2013 10:42:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 By: Vishal http://www.chilmarkresearch.com/2008/02/18/himss-phr-platforms-mia/#comment-1429 Vishal Fri, 18 Jun 2010 21:48:19 +0000 http://hitanalyst.wordpress.com/?p=123#comment-1429 Today medical practitioners are looking to avail of this federal incentive by trying to comply with the definition of meaningful use but at the same time EHR providers are looking at their own set of profits. This misunderstanding is mostly I believe as a result of wrong interpretation of the federal guidelines. The EHR providers need to look at these guidelines from the prospective of the practitioners who deal with different specialties. Each specialty EHR has its own set of challenges or requirements which I believe is overlooked by im most EHR vendors in a effort to merely follows federal guidelines. This is resulting in low usability to the practitioners, thus less ROI, finally redundancy of the EHR solution in place. I think ROI is very important factor that should be duly considered when look achieve a 'meaning use' out of a EHR solution. Though one may get vendors providing 'meaning use' at a lower cost, their ROI / savings through the use of their EHR might be pretty low when compared to costlier initial investment. Found a pretty useful <a href="http://www.waitingroomsolutions.com/wrs/emr-ehr-roi-calculator" rel="nofollow">ROI tool</a> that is pretty customizable and easy to use. It also accounts for the different specialty EHR's too. There are other good references on the topics of: <a href="http://www.waitingroomsolutions.com/wrs/arr0a-stimulus-money-44k-arra-emr-stimulus-bill-arra-ehr-stimulus-incentives" rel="nofollow">Usability/meaningful use</a> <a href="http://www.waitingroomsolutions.com/wrs/arra-stimulus-money-44k-arra-emr-stimulus-bill-arra-ehr-stimulus-incentives#Certification_Criteria_EHR" rel="nofollow">Certification criteria for EHR</a> Today medical practitioners are looking to avail of this federal incentive by trying to comply with the definition of meaningful use but at the same time EHR providers are looking at their own set of profits.
This misunderstanding is mostly I believe as a result of wrong interpretation of the federal guidelines. The EHR providers need to look at these guidelines from the prospective of the practitioners who deal with different specialties.
Each specialty EHR has its own set of challenges or requirements which I believe is overlooked by im most EHR vendors in a effort to merely follows federal guidelines. This is resulting in low usability to the practitioners, thus less ROI, finally redundancy of the EHR solution in place.
I think ROI is very important factor that should be duly considered when look achieve a ‘meaning use’ out of a EHR solution. Though one may get vendors providing ‘meaning use’ at a lower cost, their ROI / savings through the use of their EHR might be pretty low when compared to costlier initial investment. Found a pretty useful ROI tool that is pretty customizable and easy to use. It also accounts for the different specialty EHR’s too.
There are other good references on the topics of:

Usability/meaningful use

Certification criteria for EHR

]]> By: ICMCC Articles » Blog Archive » HIMSS - PHR Platforms MIA http://www.chilmarkresearch.com/2008/02/18/himss-phr-platforms-mia/#comment-1428 ICMCC Articles » Blog Archive » HIMSS - PHR Platforms MIA Mon, 18 Feb 2008 19:59:36 +0000 http://hitanalyst.wordpress.com/?p=123#comment-1428 [...] (e.g., both Google’s and Revolution Health’s CEOs will be giving keynote presentations).” Article John Moore, Chilmark Research, 18 February [...] [...] (e.g., both Google’s and Revolution Health’s CEOs will be giving keynote presentations).” Article John Moore, Chilmark Research, 18 February [...]

]]>